Post-Morteum Photography or Death Photography. This type of photography peaked
in popularity in the early 19th century. It was a way for a family
to have a keepsake of a loved one that had passed, especially with infants and
children due to the high mortality rate in the Victorian Era. With the invention
of the daguerreotype in 1839 families that could not afford to sit for a
painting portrait could far more afford a photography session. When carte de vista was invented, which allowed
multiple prints; families were able to send relatives photos of ones that had
passed. There eventually became a shift in how Death Photography was viewed,
death became viewed as a social discomfort and taking photos of the deceased
became vulgar and taboo.
The earlier Death Photos were of a loved one propped up in a
casket, later it became more of an art form and the subject would be posed in
various positions with their loved ones to look lifelike, or the subject
looking as if they were in a deep sleep. Many of the photos of children were
taken with their mothers or placed in a crib or bed with a favorite toy. Siblings
were often photographed together. To get the effect that the subject was lifelike
they would paint pupils on the photographic print, or propping the subjects
eyes open. In some photos a rosy tint
was added to the cheeks. Sometimes the only way a person can tell the living
from the dead in these photos are that the images of the living are sometimes
blurred because of how long a photography session would last, this can be seen
in many photo collections.
There are museums and private collectors that display these
throughout the world. One of the most famous collections is called “Sleeping
Beauty” which is housed at the Burns Archives in the United States http://www.burnsarchive.com/
another collection is from the Thantos Archive in Seattle Washington. http://thanatos.net/
What caused the shift of the dead being shown as something
vulgar and not to be seen or talked about? The media shows us death every day. Being
in the paranormal field and investigating the possibilities of life after death
puts our type of research to some people as just that. On a few occasions I
have had prospective clients say that they did not want people in their
locations to research the possibility of ghost because they felt it was
disrespectful. For example do you feel that investigating a location that a
murder had occurred disrespectful? Would it be disrespectful to the surviving
family members? Is it that they just want to forget?
-Raven
-Raven